🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an order issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator applied to the review board to officially classify the available footage. It first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the regulator to order platforms to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X filed an appeal for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or offensive, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". X even compared the footage and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

The majority of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have met that threshold. Consequently, the board changed the classification of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the post was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as the Kennedy video was released years after the assassination, "once emotions around the matter had subsided".

Response Following the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the decision.

"X fought this decision to defend freedom of expression and the importance of access to information about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these principles."

Representatives for the safety regulator also welcomed the board's decision, but noted that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the eSafety commissioner did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they had not met the required standard for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to use warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in line with their own content policies.