🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."